|
Vertically-Consistent Spatial Embedding of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Prof. Igor Markov, the University of Michigan
Current students: Jarrod Roy, Aaron Ng, David Papa, Kai-hui Chang, Steve Plaza
Former students: Dr. Saurabh Adya, Shubhyant Chaturvedi, James Lu
Collaborators at Michigan: Mike Moffitt,
Prof. Martha Pollack,
Prof. Valeria Bertacco
Collaborators at UCSD: Qinke Wang, Sherief Reda, Prof. Andrew Kahng
A large fraction of delay and considerable power in modern electronic
systems are due to interconnect, including signal and clock wires,
as well as various repeaters. This necessitates greater attention
to spatial embedding at the system level and below. Traditional
Verilog-based logic design, RTL design and system design at large scale
often run into surprising performance losses at the first spatial embedding.
This typically happens in floorplanning or gate-level placement, where
timing and power constraints become violated and need to be repaired.
Such complications are exacerbated by large transistor counts,
by the embedding of memories and analog components with random logic,
and by the poor scaling of interconnect at deep submicron technology nodes.
To improve the capacity and the overall success of modern electronic
system design, distances, sizes and shapes must be accounted for and
optimized at multiple layers of abstraction, with smooth transitions
between design steps and support for other design optimizations.
We pursue this notion of vertically consistent spatial embedding
in our research.
A necessary ingredient (and also an enabler of further research)
is a series of new spatial embedding algorithms and methodologies
applicable at different design steps and used in different scenarios,
as folllows.
- Early, pre-RTL spatial embedding with hard, soft or free-shape modules.
- Maintaining a consistent embedding through multiple layers of
abstraction and transformations between them.
- Physically safe logic and RTL optimizations.
- Vertically-consistent repeater/buffer insertion.
- Consistency between the spatial embedding of gates and wires,
e.g., in placement and routing.
To this end, we have developped high-capacity interconnect-driven
floorplanning with hard, soft and free-shape modules.
We introduced techniques for
incremental embedding (or adjustment) relevant to floorplanning,
standard-cell placement, mixed-size placement, with respect to
module-sizing, buffer insertion and logic restructuring. Such adjustments
correct various design violations as well as optimize interconnect.
Our work in physical synthesis shows how to make physically safe
simultaneous changes to the netlist and its embedding to significantly
improve critical path delay. We are allocating area for buffers earlier
than usual, during placement, because without this, the growing number
of buffers can make it impossible (at future technology nodes)
to meet timing constraints after place-and-route.
In the Place & Route domain, we have shown that Steiner wirelength,
a more accurate measure of routed net length than the
traditional half-perimeter wire length (HPWL) metric, can be directly
optimized in top-down congestion-driven placement, which significantly
improves routability and routed wire length.
Many of these techniques are implemented in our tools
Capo and Parquet
which are available in source code and binaries on Linux, Windows and
Solaris platforms. Newer tools under development include a constraint-driven
floorplan repair assistant (Floorist) and a counterexample-guided physical
synthesis tool (GPSy). Also see
our publications.
| |